Free coursewareRewritten from MIT OpenCourseWareCC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Open CosmologyPhysics & cosmology: four years, plus a graduate year

The geometry of open universes

Letting k go negative in the Robertson–Walker metric gives the infinite, negatively curved space of an open universe — and the three geometries together are all a homogeneous, isotropic universe can be.

You need this first

Full reading path (18 pages)
  1. Vectors (8.01)
  2. Position and velocity in one dimension (8.01)
  3. Acceleration in one dimension (8.01)
  4. Motion in two dimensions and projectiles (8.01)
  5. Newton's laws of motion (8.01)
  6. The universal law of gravitation (8.01)
  7. The homogeneous expanding universe (8.286)
  8. Why a static universe cannot work (8.286)
  9. The expanding sphere and the equation for a(t) (8.286)
  10. The Friedmann equation (8.286)
  11. Open, closed and flat universes (8.286)
  12. The closed universe as a cycloid (8.286)
  13. The age of the universe and the Big Bang singularity (8.286)
  14. The age of a closed universe from H and Ω (8.286)
  15. The open universe and the age of any matter universe (8.286)
  16. Non-Euclidean geometry (8.286)
  17. The metric of a sphere and of a closed universe (8.286)
  18. Curvature and expansion — the Robertson–Walker metric (8.286)
On this page · 4 sections
  1. Just let k be negative?
  2. Is the open universe homogeneous?
  3. Finite or infinite?
  4. Summary

Lecture 11 built the metric of a closed universe from a 3-sphere. The Newtonian model allowed kk to be positive, zero or negative, so Lecture 12 asks: what does space look like when k<0k < 0?

Just let k be negative?#

Here is the Robertson–Walker metric found for the closed universe, with r=sin⁡ψ/kr = \sin\psi/\sqrt k:

Robertson–Walker metric
ds2=a2(t)[dr21−kr2+r2(dθ2+sin⁡2θ dϕ2)]ds^2 = a^2(t)\left[\frac{dr^2}{1 - k r^2} + r^2\left(d\theta^2 + \sin^2\theta\,d\phi^2\right)\right]
In words

ds squared equals a squared (t) [ dr squared over 1 minus k r squared plus r squared (d theta squared plus sine squared theta d phi squared ) ]

Guth's proposal is to keep this formula and simply allow k<0k < 0. He compares it with a rule like "today's stock price equals yesterday's plus the change", which works whether the change is positive or negative.

But he warns that this trick does not always work. For k<0k < 0, k\sqrt k is imaginary, so r=sin⁡ψ/kr = \sin\psi/\sqrt k makes no sense with a real angle. Worse, in the ψ\psi form,

The same metric in terms of ψ
ds2=a2(t)k[dψ2+sin⁡2ψ(dθ2+sin⁡2θ dϕ2)]ds^2 = \frac{a^2(t)}{k}\left[d\psi^2 + \sin^2\psi\left(d\theta^2 + \sin^2\theta\,d\phi^2\right)\right]
In words

ds squared equals a squared (t) over k [d psi squared plus sine squared psi (d theta squared plus sine squared theta d phi squared ) ]

a negative kk with real ψ\psi makes every ds2ds^2 negative. That space would still be homogeneous and isotropic, but distances must be positive (positive definite), so it is not acceptable. The rr form is the "magical" one in which flipping the sign of kk just works.

Why it works is shown by letting the angle become imaginary as well, ψ=iχ\psi = i\chi. The sine of an imaginary number is a hyperbolic sine, sin⁡(iχ)=isinh⁡χ\sin(i\chi) = i\sinh\chi, so with k=−∣k∣k = -|k|:

The open universe with an imaginary angle
r=sinh⁡χ∣k∣,ds2=a2(t)∣k∣[dχ2+sinh⁡2χ(dθ2+sin⁡2θ dϕ2)]r = \frac{\sinh\chi}{\sqrt{|k|}}, \qquad ds^2 = \frac{a^2(t)}{|k|}\left[d\chi^2 + \sinh^2\chi\left(d\theta^2 + \sin^2\theta\,d\phi^2\right)\right]
In words

r equals sinh chi over the square root of |k| , ds squared equals a squared (t) over |k| [d chi squared plus sinh squared chi (d theta squared plus sine squared theta d phi squared ) ]

Source: 8.286 Lecture 12 transcript, argued in words on pp. 17–18; formula worked out here

Both sign problems cancel: dψ2d\psi^2 becomes −dχ2-d\chi^2, sin⁡2ψ\sin^2\psi becomes −sinh⁡2χ-\sinh^2\chi, and a2/ka^2/k becomes −a2/∣k∣-a^2/|k|, so the metric is positive again and rr stays positive. (Guth argues this in words and promises to show that rr stays positive; the formula above makes it explicit.)

Is the open universe homogeneous?#

What makes a metric acceptable for cosmology? Not just "no contradictions" or "the right limits", but the two properties we observe: homogeneity and isotropy. Isotropy about the origin is clear, since the angular part is an ordinary sphere. Homogeneity is hidden, because the coordinates single out an origin.

For the closed universe Guth gives a recipe for proving that every point is equivalent to the origin. Take an arbitrary point (r0,θ0,ϕ0)(r_0, \theta_0, \phi_0), and:

  1. compute its four-dimensional coordinates (x0,y0,z0,w0)(x_0, y_0, z_0, w_0) on the 3-sphere;
  2. apply a four-dimensional rotation that carries this point to the "North Pole" (0,0,0,R)(0, 0, 0, R), which is the origin of the coordinates;
  3. convert the rotated coordinates back to r′,θ′,ϕ′r', \theta', \phi'.

A rotation does not change distances on a sphere, so the metric keeps exactly the same form in the primed coordinates, with the chosen point now at the origin. Guth admits he has never carried out the algebra in full, but expects each step to work equally well for negative kk, so the open universe is homogeneous too.

He also quotes a theorem without proof (proved, for example, in Steven Weinberg's Gravitation and Cosmology, as Guth notes on p. 19 of the transcript): every homogeneous, isotropic three-dimensional space can be written in Robertson–Walker form with suitable coordinates. Closed, flat and open universes are the only possibilities.

Finite or infinite?#

The three cases differ sharply in size.

  • Closed (k>0k > 0). The metric is singular where kr2=1kr^2 = 1, i.e. at the equator ψ=π/2\psi = \pi/2. There rr reaches its largest value 1/k1/\sqrt k, then decreases again as ψ→π\psi \to \pi. Each value of rr labels two places, one in each "hemisphere". The total volume is finite.
  • Flat (k=0k = 0). Ordinary Euclidean space in polar coordinates; rr runs to infinity.
  • Open (k<0k < 0). Nothing in the metric is singular, so rr can grow without limit. But rr is a coordinate, not a distance. Integrating the metric along a radial line gives the physical (proper) distance from the origin:
Proper radius in an open universe
ℓphys(r)=a(t)∫0rdr′1−kr′2=a(t) sinh⁡−1 ⁣(−k r)−k\ell_\text{phys}(r) = a(t)\int_0^r \frac{dr'}{\sqrt{1 - k r'^2}} = a(t)\,\frac{\sinh^{-1}\!\left(\sqrt{-k}\,r\right)}{\sqrt{-k}}
In words

ell sub phys (r) equals a(t) the integral from 0 to r of dr prime over the square root of 1 minus k r prime squared equals a(t) inverse sinh ( the square root of minus k r ) over the square root of minus k

This grows without limit, so the open universe is infinite. (In the lecture Guth wonders aloud whether it grows faster than linearly; in fact it grows more slowly, like a logarithm of rr. Turned around, the circumference of a sphere grows exponentially with its proper radius.)

Proper distance against the coordinate r, computed from the metric. In a closed universe r stops at 1 (the equator, at distance π/2; only the 'northern hemisphere' is shown); in an open universe r and ℓ both go on forever.

The two-dimensional version of the open metric is exactly the Gauss–Bolyai–Lobachevsky geometry of Lecture 10. Klein's coordinates for it look complicated because they were chosen to show other things; in Robertson–Walker coordinates, physicists find it straightforward.

Worked example

How far is the edge of a hemisphere?

In a closed universe with a=1a = 1 and k=1k = 1, how far is it from the origin to the equator? In an open universe with ∣k∣=1|k| = 1, at what coordinate rr is the proper distance 3?

Closed

ℓ=sin⁡−1(k r)/k\ell = \sin^{-1}(\sqrt k\,r)/\sqrt k at r=1/k=1r = 1/\sqrt k = 1 gives ℓ=sin⁡−1(1)=π/2≈1.57\ell = \sin^{-1}(1) = \pi/2 \approx 1.57: a quarter of a great circle of radius 1.

Open

ℓ=sinh⁡−1r=3\ell = \sinh^{-1} r = 3 gives r=sinh⁡3≈10.0r = \sinh 3 \approx 10.0. Going from r=1.18r = 1.18 (where ℓ=1\ell = 1) to r=10r = 10 — more than eight times further in the coordinate — only triples the distance: coordinates stretch enormously at large distances.

Summary#

  • The Robertson–Walker metric in its rr form works for any sign of kk; the ψ\psi form would give negative distances for k<0k < 0 unless ψ\psi is imaginary, which turns sines into hyperbolic sines.
  • Homogeneity can be shown by rotating the embedding sphere (closed case) and carries over to k<0k < 0; every homogeneous, isotropic space has Robertson–Walker form (a theorem Guth quotes).
  • Closed universes are finite (r≤1/kr \le 1/\sqrt k, double-valued); flat and open universes are infinite, with proper radius asinh⁡−1(−k r)/−ka\sinh^{-1}(\sqrt{-k}\,r)/\sqrt{-k} in the open case.

Symbols on this page

Show the 15 symbols used here
θ\theta theta
Polar angle: measured from the north pole (0) to the south pole (π). Say it: “theta” (sounds like “thay-ta or thee-ta”).
π\pi pi
The ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter, π ≈ 3.14159. Say it: “pi”.
ϕ\phi phi
Azimuthal angle (longitude), running from 0 to 2π around the axis. Say it: “phi” (sounds like “fye”).
χ\chi chi
A real variable used when the angle ψ becomes imaginary, ψ = iχ. Say it: “chi” (sounds like “kye”).
ψ\psi psi
The extra angle of the 3-sphere: how far round the closed universe a point is. Say it: “psi” (sounds like “sigh”).
ℓ\ell script l
A length or distance; ℓ_p is a physical distance and ℓ_c a comoving one. Say it: “ell”.
≈\approx approximately equal
Is approximately equal to. Say it: “is approximately”.
≤\le less than or equal
Is less than or equal to. Say it: “is less than or equal to”.
→\to arrow
Goes to (tends to), or becomes. Say it: “goes to”.
∫\int integral
Integral: the sum of infinitely many small pieces, such as the area under a curve. Say it: “the integral of”.
sin⁡\sin sine
Sine of an angle. Say it: “sine”.
sinh⁡\sinh hyperbolic sine
Hyperbolic sine, (eˣ − e⁻ˣ)/2. Say it: “sinh” (sounds like “shine or sinch”).
aa a
The scale factor a(t): how much the universe has expanded. Physical distance = a × comoving distance (Guth's units: metres per notch). Say it: “a”.
zz z
A Cartesian coordinate, with x, y (and w on the 3-sphere). Say it: “z”.
kk k
The curvature constant: k > 0 closed, k = 0 flat, k < 0 open (Guth's units: 1/notch²). Say it: “k”.

Tap or click a symbol in a formula to see the same explanation. All symbols: symbols and notation.

Where this leads

Pages that build on this

Check your understanding

  1. Why can't we simply put k<0k < 0 into the closed-universe metric written with the angle ψ\psi?
  2. Is an open universe finite or infinite?
  3. In a closed universe, what happens to the coordinate r=sin⁡ψ/kr = \sin\psi/\sqrt k beyond the 'equator' ψ=π/2\psi = \pi/2?
  4. Which statement does Guth quote as a theorem (without proving it)?
0 of 4 answered

Flashcards

1 / 3