Free coursewareRewritten from MIT OpenCourseWareCC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Open CosmologyPhysics & cosmology: four years, plus a graduate year

Exponential expansion, de Sitter space and the inflationary scenario

A false vacuum makes the universe grow exponentially — de Sitter space, with an event horizon one Hubble length away that protects the inflating region. With grand-unified numbers, a patch 10⁻²⁷ cm across grows to centimetres, reheats to 10¹⁶ GeV and becomes everything we see.

You need this first

Full reading path (44 pages)
  1. Vectors (8.01)
  2. Position and velocity in one dimension (8.01)
  3. Acceleration in one dimension (8.01)
  4. Motion in two dimensions and projectiles (8.01)
  5. The homogeneous expanding universe (8.286)
  6. The Doppler effect and special relativity (8.286)
  7. Cosmological redshift (8.286)
  8. Newton's laws of motion (8.01)
  9. The universal law of gravitation (8.01)
  10. Why a static universe cannot work (8.286)
  11. The expanding sphere and the equation for a(t) (8.286)
  12. The Friedmann equation (8.286)
  13. Open, closed and flat universes (8.286)
  14. The closed universe as a cycloid (8.286)
  15. The age of the universe and the Big Bang singularity (8.286)
  16. The age of a closed universe from H and Ω (8.286)
  17. The open universe and the age of any matter universe (8.286)
  18. Non-Euclidean geometry (8.286)
  19. The metric of a sphere and of a closed universe (8.286)
  20. Curvature and expansion — the Robertson–Walker metric (8.286)
  21. The geometry of open universes (8.286)
  22. The spacetime interval (8.286)
  23. The spacetime metric of the universe (8.286)
  24. The geodesic equation (8.286)
  25. Simplifying the geodesic equation (8.286)
  26. Falling into a black hole (8.286)
  27. Mass, energy and the dilution of radiation (8.286)
  28. Matter–radiation equality and the pressure of light (8.286)
  29. The horizon distance (8.286)
  30. The radiation-dominated universe (8.286)
  31. The cosmological constant and vacuum energy (8.286)
  32. The age of the universe with vacuum energy (8.286)
  33. How bright is a distant supernova? (8.286)
  34. The supernova evidence for acceleration (8.286)
  35. The puzzle of the vacuum energy, and Einstein's mistake about Friedmann (8.286)
  36. Black-body radiation (8.286)
  37. Neutrinos and counting particle species (8.286)
  38. The temperature of the early universe and decoupling (8.286)
  39. The horizon problem (8.286)
  40. The flatness problem (8.286)
  41. The Standard Model, gauge theories and grand unification (8.286)
  42. The Higgs field and spontaneous symmetry breaking (8.286)
  43. Topological defects and the magnetic monopole problem (8.286)
  44. The false vacuum and the mechanism of inflation (8.286)
On this page · 5 sections
  1. Exponential expansion
  2. The event horizon
  3. Sample numbers
  4. The scenario
  5. Summary

Exponential expansion#

To see what happens once inflation begins, treat a small region of the patch as a homogeneous Robertson–Walker universe, leave out the curvature term (it quickly becomes negligible, as we'll see) and let the false-vacuum density dominate:

Friedmann equation during inflation
(a˙a)2=8π3Gρf\left(\frac{\dot a}{a}\right)^2 = \frac{8\pi}{3}G\rho_f
In words

( a dot over a ) squared equals 8 pi over 3 G rho sub f

The right side is a constant, so a˙/a\dot a/a is constant, and

Exponential expansion
a(t)=const×eχt,χ=8π3Gρfa(t) = \text{const}\times e^{\chi t}, \qquad \chi = \sqrt{\frac{8\pi}{3}G\rho_f}
In words

a(t) equals const times e to the power chi t , chi equals the square root of 8 pi over 3 G rho sub f

Source: 8.286 Lecture 23 transcript, pp. 11–12

With the full equations there would be other solutions for other initial conditions, but this exponential growth always dominates at late times. That is what inflation is: a period of exponential expansion.

The cosmological no-hair conjecture

Why is inflation so robust — why does it lead to the same result however it starts? One reason is the cosmological no-hair statement: if the matter has p=−ρc2p = -\rho c^2 with ρ>0\rho > 0, essentially any starting metric evolves to look, locally, like this flat, exponentially expanding spacetime. It can be proven for small initial deviations (perturbatively); beyond that it is believed but unproven, a conjecture. "Locally" matters: a closed universe filled with false vacuum stays closed forever, never literally flat, but as it grows exponentially every piece of it looks flatter and flatter.

de Sitter space

This flat, exponentially expanding spacetime is de Sitter space, after the Dutch astronomer who described it early in the history of general relativity (Guth thinks in 1917, which is right). It has properties de Sitter himself did not notice: by choosing different surfaces of equal time, the very same spacetime can be described as an open or a closed Robertson–Walker universe, homogeneous in each case. For most purposes, though, think of it as flat and exponentially expanding.

The event horizon#

The horizons met earlier in the course are, technically, particle horizons: they concern the past — how far light can have travelled since the beginning. de Sitter space also has an event horizon, which concerns the future: two events at the same time that are far enough apart can never influence each other's future, because the expansion outruns the light.

Light's coordinate speed is c/a(t)c/a(t), so the coordinate distance it covers between t1t_1 and t2t_2 is

Coordinate distance travelled by light
Δr(t1,t2)=∫t1t2c dta(t)=cconst⋅χ(e−χt1−e−χt2)\Delta r(t_1,t_2) = \int_{t_1}^{t_2}\frac{c\,dt}{a(t)} = \frac{c}{\text{const}\cdot\chi}\left(e^{-\chi t_1} - e^{-\chi t_2}\right)
In words

capital delta r(t sub 1 ,t sub 2 ) equals the integral from t sub 1 to t sub 2 of c dt over a(t) equals c over const times chi (e to the power minus chi t sub 1 minus e to the power minus chi t sub 2 )

Source: 8.286 Lecture 23 transcript, pp. 13–14

As t2→∞t_2 \to \infty this approaches a finite limit: anything starting farther away in coordinates will never be reached by the light, however long you wait. Multiplying the limit by a(t1)a(t_1) gives the physical distance at time t1t_1:

Event horizon distance
ℓevent=a(t1)lim⁡t2→∞Δr(t1,t2)=c χ−1\ell_\text{event} = a(t_1)\lim_{t_2\to\infty}\Delta r(t_1,t_2) = c\,\chi^{-1}
In words

ell sub event equals a(t sub 1 ) the limit as t sub 2 goes to infinity of capital delta r(t sub 1 ,t sub 2 ) equals c chi to the power minus 1

— the Hubble length. Light emitted now from anything more than one Hubble length away will never reach us.

Computed from the formula above: the coordinate distance light covers after time t₁, expressed as a physical distance at t₁ (that is, multiplied by a(t₁)), is (c/χ)(1 − e^(−χ(t₂ − t₁))). It never exceeds c/χ, however long the light travels: objects farther than one Hubble length are cut off for ever.

This matters because nothing travels faster than light. If a de Sitter region is surrounded by "junk" we can't predict, whatever is outside can never penetrate more than about one Hubble length into it. The interior is protected — a rigorous theorem of general relativity, Guth says — so once a sizeable region of de Sitter space exists, it never disappears, whatever happens outside.

Sample numbers#

We don't know at what energy inflation happened, and so far every observable consequence is much the same whatever the scale. Inflation was invented in the context of grand unified theories, still a plausible setting, so Guth gives grand-unified sample numbers.

The GUT scale comes from measuring the strengths of the three Standard Model interactions — one for each of SU(3), SU(2) and U(1) — at accessible energies (around 100 GeV) and extrapolating them theoretically to high energies. They meet, to good accuracy, at one point: that is the basis of grand unification, one interaction that looks like three at low energy through spontaneous symmetry breaking. The meeting is decent in the Standard Model as it is, and works much better in its minimal supersymmetric extension (where every known particle gets an unseen partner) — a piece of evidence for supersymmetry. Either way the lines meet at about 101610^{16} GeV.

We can't calculate vacuum energies, but dimensional analysis fixes the false-vacuum mass density up to factors: the only way to make a mass density from EGUTE_\text{GUT} and the constants of physics is

False-vacuum mass density at the GUT scale
ρf∼EGUT4ℏ3c5≈2.3×1081 g/cm3\rho_f \sim \frac{E_\text{GUT}^4}{\hbar^3c^5} \approx 2.3\times10^{81}\ \text{g/cm}^3
In words

rho sub f is of order E sub GUT to the power 4 over h bar cubed c to the power 5 is approximately 2.3 times 10 to the power 81 g/cm cubed

Putting this into χ\chi:

Expansion time and Hubble length
χ−1≈2.8×10−38 s,cχ−1≈8×10−28 cm\chi^{-1} \approx 2.8\times10^{-38}\ \text{s}, \qquad c\chi^{-1} \approx 8\times10^{-28}\ \text{cm}
In words

chi to the power minus 1 is approximately 2.8 times 10 to the power minus 38 s , c chi to the power minus 1 is approximately 8 times 10 to the power minus 28 cm

[Guth first labels the time as χ\chi; a student catches it, and he corrects it to χ−1\chi^{-1}.] All off scale by human standards — as grand unified theories are.

The scenario#

Start with a patch of roughly that Hubble length, ∼10−27\sim 10^{-27} cm — some 14 or 15 orders of magnitude smaller than a proton (∼10−13\sim 10^{-13} cm). Inflation must last long enough for the patch to reach roughly 1 to 10 cm or more by its end. More is no problem: it just means more inflation than the minimum.

How does inflation end? On the plateau, fluctuations destabilise the field; it rolls down the hill and oscillates about the bottom. Because it interacts with other fields, it hands its energy to them — ultimately the Standard Model fields — heating them into the hot soup of particles that is the starting point of the conventional Big Bang. This reheating produces a temperature comparable to the theory's own scale: about 101610^{16} GeV for grand unification.

After that the universe coasts, with aT≈aT \approx constant, so the scale factor grows by the ratio of temperatures:

Expansion from the end of inflation to today
anowaend≈1016 GeVk (2.7 K),10 cm×anowaend≈450×109 light-years\frac{a_\text{now}}{a_\text{end}} \approx \frac{10^{16}\ \text{GeV}}{k\,(2.7\ \text{K})}, \qquad 10\ \text{cm} \times \frac{a_\text{now}}{a_\text{end}} \approx 450\times10^{9}\ \text{light-years}
In words

a sub now over a sub end is approximately 10 to the power 16 GeV over k (2.7 K ) , 10 cm times a sub now over a sub end is approximately 450 times 10 to the power 9 light-years

[Guth says the temperature ratio is 101610^{16} GeV "times" k×2.7k \times 2.7 K; it is the quotient, as written above.] Guth estimates that we need only about 40×10940 \times 10^9 light-years to cover the observed universe (a rough figure: its present diameter is about 9×10109 \times 10^{10} light-years), so this is ten times too big — which is fine: 1 cm at the end of inflation would do, and 10 cm is generous. In short: a tiny patch inflates to a centimetre or more, reheats, and coasts into something larger than the whole region we observe.

Worked example

How many e-folds?

Using the sample numbers, by what factor must the patch grow during inflation (from cχ−1c\chi^{-1} to 10 cm)? How many e-folds is that, and how long does it take?

Growth factor

10 cm/(8.3×10−28 cm)=1.2×102810\ \text{cm}/(8.3 \times 10^{-28}\ \text{cm}) = 1.2 \times 10^{28}.

E-folds

ln⁡(1.2×1028)=64.7\ln(1.2 \times 10^{28}) = 64.7: about 65 e-folds of expansion.

Duration

Each e-fold takes χ−1=2.8×10−38\chi^{-1} = 2.8 \times 10^{-38} s, so 65 of them take 1.8×10−361.8 \times 10^{-36} s. Inflation can be over by around 10−3510^{-35} s, the time Guth quotes for inflation at the end of the lecture.

Summary#

  • With the false vacuum dominating, (a˙/a)2=8π3Gρf(\dot a/a)^2 = \frac{8\pi}{3}G\rho_f gives a∝eχta \propto e^{\chi t}, χ=8πGρf/3\chi = \sqrt{8\pi G\rho_f/3}.
  • By the cosmological no-hair conjecture, almost any starting geometry evolves to look locally like this flat exponential expansion: de Sitter space.
  • de Sitter space has an event horizon at one Hubble length, cχ−1c\chi^{-1}, which shields an inflating region from whatever lies outside.
  • At the GUT scale: ρf∼E4/ℏ3c5≈2.3×1081\rho_f \sim E^4/\hbar^3c^5 \approx 2.3\times10^{81} g/cm³, χ−1≈2.8×10−38\chi^{-1} \approx 2.8\times10^{-38} s, cχ−1≈8×10−28c\chi^{-1} \approx 8\times10^{-28} cm. About 65 e-folds stretch this to ~10 cm; reheating to ~101610^{16} GeV and coasting then give a region larger than the observable universe.

Symbols on this page

Show the 24 symbols used here
Δ\Delta capital delta
A change or difference in a quantity, e.g. Δx = x₂ − x₁. Say it: “capital delta”.
π\pi pi
The ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter, π ≈ 3.14159. Say it: “pi”.
ρ\rho rho
Density: mass (or energy divided by c²) per unit volume. ρ_c is the critical density, ρ̄ the mean density. Say it: “rho”.
χ\chi chi
The rate of exponential expansion, χ = √(8πGρ_f/3). Say it: “chi” (sounds like “kye”).
ℓ\ell script l
A length or distance; ℓ_p is a physical distance and ℓ_c a comoving one. Say it: “ell”.
ℏ\hbar h-bar
The reduced Planck constant, ħ = h/2π ≈ 1.055 × 10⁻³⁴ J·s. Say it: “h bar”.
∞\infty infinity
Infinity: larger than any number. Say it: “infinity”.
≈\approx approximately equal
Is approximately equal to. Say it: “is approximately”.
∼\sim tilde (similar)
Is of the order of: roughly equal, to within a factor of a few. Say it: “is of order”.
∝\propto proportional to
Is proportional to: doubling one doubles the other. Say it: “is proportional to”.
→\to arrow
Goes to (tends to), or becomes. Say it: “goes to”.
×\times times
Times (multiplication). Between two vectors: the cross product. Say it: “times”.
⋅\cdot dot
Times (multiplication). Between two vectors: the dot product. Say it: “times”.
∫\int integral
Integral: the sum of infinitely many small pieces, such as the area under a curve. Say it: “the integral of”.
lim⁡\lim limit
Limit: the value approached as the variable written below approaches its target. Say it: “the limit”.
ln⁡\ln natural logarithm
Natural logarithm (base e ≈ 2.718). Say it: “log”.
a˙\dot a dot
Rate of change with time: ȧ = da/dt. Say it: “dot”.
aa a
The scale factor a(t): how much the universe has expanded. Physical distance = a × comoving distance (Guth's units: metres per notch). Say it: “a”.
HH H
The Hubble parameter H = ȧ/a: the expansion rate of the universe at a given time. Say it: “H”.
GG G
Newton's gravitational constant, G ≈ 6.674 × 10⁻¹¹ m³ kg⁻¹ s⁻². Say it: “G”.
cc c
The speed of light, c ≈ 2.998 × 10⁸ m/s. Say it: “c”.
kk k
Boltzmann's constant, in kT (the typical thermal energy at temperature T); k ≈ 1.381 × 10⁻²³ J/K. Say it: “k”.
TT T
Temperature, in kelvin. Say it: “T”.
ρf\rho_{f} false-vacuum density
The mass density of the false vacuum during inflation; constant in time. Say it: “rho f”.

Tap or click a symbol in a formula to see the same explanation. All symbols: symbols and notation.

Where this leads

Pages that build on this

Check your understanding

  1. With the false vacuum dominating a flat universe, how does the scale factor grow?
  2. What does the cosmological no-hair conjecture say?
  3. How far away, physically, is the event horizon in de Sitter space?
  4. Why is the event horizon important for inflation?
  5. With EGUT=1016E_\text{GUT} = 10^{16} GeV, what is the false-vacuum mass density E4/(ℏ3c5)E^4/(\hbar^3c^5)?
0 of 5 answered

Flashcards

1 / 5

Credits and license

This page is a rewritten explanation based on MIT 8.286 Lecture 23: Inflation from MIT 8.286 The Early Universe (Fall 2013), taught by Prof. Alan Guth, published on MIT OpenCourseWare under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

MIT readings used: 8.286 Lecture 23 transcript.

MIT and the instructors do not endorse this site. All diagrams and plots on this page are generated by this site. This page is licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0: you may share and adapt it for non-commercial use with attribution, under the same license.