With the metric of the universe in hand, the second half of Lecture 13 asks how things move in a given metric. The tool is the geodesic: the path of stationary length. (That free particles move on geodesics is taken up in Lecture 14.) The method is general: it works for any metric, including the Schwarzschild metric of stars and black holes, which Guth mentions as a later example. In the lecture he showed the long equations from his lecture notes on screen rather than writing them on the board; the same equations appear on slides 2–5 of Lecture 14, which are cited here.
Geodesics: stationary paths#
Guth starts with the simplest case: a two-dimensional space with coordinates and and some metric, the kind of space Gauss, Bolyai and Lobachevsky studied. Everything carries over to spacetime unchanged.
A geodesic between two points is a path whose length is stationary: change the path slightly, keeping the endpoints fixed, and the length does not change to first order. In an ordinary space a geodesic is usually the shortest path. In spacetime, where the metric is not positive definite, geodesics can also be maxima or saddle points. The derivation only uses "the first-order change vanishes", so it covers all of these at once.
[Guth suggests that in two-dimensional spaces the stationary paths are always minima. Not quite: on a sphere the long way round a great circle between two points is also stationary, but it is not the shortest path: it is a saddle point.]
A better notation#
Two improvements make the metric easier to handle.
Number the coordinates. Write instead of . The superscripts are labels, not powers — an unfortunate clash, tolerated because general relativity needs both upper and lower indices.
Sum with indices. The metric becomes . The and terms are the old and terms; and are equal and both multiply . Then comes Einstein's summation convention: an index that appears twice, once up and once down, is summed automatically, so the sum signs can be dropped.
In words
ds squared equals g sub ij (x to the power k ) dx to the power i dx to the power j
In four dimensions this one line stands for 16 terms (10 different ones, since ).
The length of a path#
Describe a path from to by two functions of a parameter , which runs from to :
In words
x to the power i ( lambda ), x to the power i (0) equals x to the power i sub A , x to the power i ( lambda sub f ) equals x to the power i sub B
Cut the path into small pieces from to . Over one piece the coordinates change by ; putting this into the metric gives
In words
ds squared equals g sub ij (x to the power k ( lambda ) ) dx to the power i over d lambda dx to the power j over d lambda d lambda squared
For a space, is positive, so the square root is the length of the piece. Adding up all pieces:
In words
S [x to the power i ( lambda ) ] equals the integral from 0 to lambda sub f of the square root of g sub ij (x to the power k ( lambda ) ) dx to the power i over d lambda dx to the power j over d lambda d lambda
Varying the path#
To test whether a path is a geodesic, compare it with every nearby path between the same endpoints. This is the calculus of variations, which slide 4 dates to 1696. Write a nearby path as
In words
x tilde to the power i ( lambda ) equals x to the power i ( lambda ) plus alpha w to the power i ( lambda ), w to the power i (0) equals 0, w to the power i ( lambda sub f ) equals 0
Here is any ordinary function (with values like 2 or 5) and is a small number that controls how far the new path strays. The conditions on keep the endpoints fixed — otherwise you could always find a shorter path by moving them. The path is a geodesic if
In words
d S [ x tilde to the power i ( lambda ) ] over d alpha evaluated at alpha equals 0 equals 0 for all w to the power i ( lambda )
Differentiating the length#
Name the integrand of the varied path's length:
In words
S [ x tilde to the power i ( lambda ) ] equals the integral from 0 to lambda sub f of the square root of A( lambda , alpha ) d lambda , A( lambda , alpha ) equals g sub ij ( x tilde to the power k ( lambda ) ) d x tilde to the power i over d lambda d x tilde to the power j over d lambda
appears in three places. The metric does not depend on directly, but it is evaluated at , which does; by the chain rule
In words
partial g sub ij over partial alpha equals partial g sub ij over partial x to the power k partial x tilde to the power k over partial alpha equals partial g sub ij over partial x to the power k w to the power k
and each gives . The derivative of a square root brings . After differentiating, everything else is set to , so the tildes disappear. The two terms with are equal once the summed ("dummy") indices and are renamed, using , which gives a factor 2:
In words
dS over d alpha evaluated at alpha equals 0 equals one half the integral from 0 to lambda sub f of 1 over the square root of A( lambda , 0) [ partial g sub ij over partial x to the power k w to the power k dx to the power i over d lambda dx to the power j over d lambda plus 2 g sub ij dw to the power i over d lambda dx to the power j over d lambda ]d lambda
The key step: integration by parts#
The first term is proportional to , the second to its derivative, so it is not yet clear when the sum vanishes for every . Guth calls this the only real difficulty in the derivation; the fix is to integrate the second term by parts, , with
- and , so .
The boundary term contains at the two endpoints, where it vanishes: no boundary term survives. Now appears undifferentiated in both terms. Renaming dummy indices so it carries the same index in each, it can be taken outside:
In words
dS over d alpha evaluated at alpha equals 0 equals the integral from 0 to lambda sub f of 1 over 2 the square root of A partial g sub jk over partial x to the power i dx to the power j over d lambda dx to the power k over d lambda minus d over d lambda [ 1 over the square root of A g sub ij dx to the power j over d lambda ] w to the power i ( lambda ) d lambda
The geodesic equation#
This must vanish for every . One integral can be zero by luck — positive in some places, negative in others. But if the expression in curly brackets were not zero, we could choose equal to it; the integrand would then be a perfect square and the integral could not vanish. So the brackets must vanish identically:
In words
d over d lambda [ 1 over the square root of A g sub ij dx to the power j over d lambda ] equals 1 over 2 the square root of A partial g sub jk over partial x to the power i dx to the power j over d lambda dx to the power k over d lambda
There is one equation for each value of . Both sides depend on the metric and on the path, through . A continuous path is a geodesic if and only if it satisfies this equation. Lecture 14 simplifies it and tries it on examples.
Straight lines in the flat plane
For the flat plane in Cartesian coordinates, and . What does the geodesic equation say? Then compare the straight path from to with the parabola , , .
Right-hand side
The metric is constant, so and the right-hand side vanishes.
Left-hand side
, so the equation says . Since , this is : the coordinates change at a constant rate with distance. The geodesics are straight lines, as they should be.
The parabola is not one
Along the parabola . For : , which is not zero for . So the parabola fails the equation.
Lengths
Straight line: . Parabola: , longer. It is exactly the path of the family in the graph; its mirror image, at , has the same length.
Summary#
- A geodesic is a path of stationary length between fixed endpoints: usually a minimum in space, possibly a maximum or saddle in spacetime.
- Index notation: , summed over repeated upper–lower indices (Einstein convention).
- A path has length . Compare it with , at the ends, and demand at for all .
- Integration by parts, with no boundary term, leaves for all , so : the geodesic equation .